There has been no evidence of a submitted statement by the Air Force that some sightings of unidentified objects have any technological developments or principles of flight beyond the scientific range of today.So a sighting of such a craft is considered totally unidentified when a sighting has been reported, and does apparently contain a good amount of information about the whole event that is required to give an explanation of the sighting by the people involved in the event. But, the description of the object or its motion for that matter can not for some reason give vent to a correlated report. Due to the fact that the air force says that it can not identity these craft as we have not the scientific know how at the present time.

The point of this is that the Air Force statements on these sightings does admit that the unidentified objects cannot be correlated with any known aerial phenomena at all. This statement mentions that a sighting categorised as unidentified and contains all the relevant information pertinent to the necessity of a valid hypothesis is not valid at all. It also says that of the object or the phenomena. Does it not seem strange that the basic of what you have just read is that as we have a U.F.O and can they say that these sightings are categorised as unidentified do not represent a technological development and there are principles beyond the range of present day scientific knowledge. It would have it that the air force is saying, in effect, that even, it nevertheless does not exhibit any features that are unknown a most difficult exercise in logic I must say.

Also, it is obvious that the Air Force does not accept the many reports of ultra- high speeds of these craft and the right angle turns they do.

We find in the official statements some thing in the line of, say , technological developments and talk of principles. Would not the developments out of these sightings of these craft become quite apparent. One could quite easily suggest that the use of the word PRINCIPLE’ has been included to enable semantic escape from futuristic events. The reason for this is a suggestion that it is a claim by those believers in the UFO PHENOMENA THAT THEY EXIST. They are propelled by there believes as they think that the craft are propelled by the certain principles of magnetism. It is true that modem science is aware of the existence of this means of propulsion. However, to date it appears that man has not been able to apply these principles of propulsion as is given off by these craft and exhibited very well by there colours.

However, to date, it appears that man has not been able to apply these ways of using this type of propulsion as exhibited by the flight characteristics of these craft. So it is therefore that these craft known as UFO-objects - do not exhibit any unknown principles and could be partially true in nature, but have not been fully discovered to the full so we have not as yet got the know how of these craft.

It is said that there is no - get this - NO identified flying object reported investigated and evaluated by the air force that has ever given any indication of any threat at all to our National security. So since the air force can control the outcome of any investigation. That is, if the air force says that a UFO sighting can be explained as a weather balloon, then they also say that the weather balloon had no hostile intent. The problem here is that of credibility. Also one wonders why there is even the need to make a statement about intent, since the Air Force has for a long time maintained that UFOs do not exist. One might also ask why an Air Force aircraft would shoot at a UFO if there was no threat Or has there ever been a threat, but just curiosity.

However, confidence is apparently running very high in some of the circles that have cropped up all over the world, and they say the UFOs are here to stay. And with this there is a continued interest in the capitalising of this ongoing possibility of the construction and the propulsion of a vehicle that can be used for all when we have once and for all solved the way of using discs with a magnetic drive wave propulsion system. Which may I suggest have more to it than seems to meet the eye since the Air Force can control the outcome of any of these investigations. I would have it that the Air Force would say that a sighting of an unidentified object could be explained, as a weather balloon had no hostile intent. This promotes a problem that of the credibility of this sighting. Also one wonders why there is even the need to make such a suggestion of hostile intent by the intruding craft, since the air force has for such a long time now given the notice on this subject as none existent.

By now it would seem quite obvious that there is no outward involvement within this earth society. If this action by the air force does continue, and I know it will do just that in the years to come and as the UFOs of the passed and the future continue the society that we have will remain as it has done over the last years. For me that is from the l940s to the now - year 2000. Then the scientists stand a good chance of being the supremes of the day.

There seems to be two very significant problems with this subject. It has it that we have got the know how of the day and we take it that assuming that we have some sort of threat from these craft. It is found that we with all that we have do have a problem with this subject as we find the military potential which we posses today is demonstrably inadequate to cope with a threat of this kind, were it a threat there at all. This inadequacy is reflected in both passive role of detection and the tracking and also the active role of the offensive picture to this subject.

The tracking and detection by radar is questionable as a combination of some other small type radar cross-section and high speed radar are used for tracking these objects on there flight duration. Now assuming that the reflective surface were sufficient to give a good return, high speed and very erratic flight paths would make it virtually impossible to effectively pass the track though the radar network or the individual radar systems stations. Any radar stations working on the ballistic trajectory principal “which we still have” or equipped with moving target indicators [MTI.] circuitry would confounded by the erratic flight and the ability of the space vehicles to come to a full stop in there flight path. In the case of the MTI., the craft would appear to have disappeared from the scope when it comes to an abrupt stop. Even assuming that a craft could be detected and tracked, we have nothing in the inventory, aircraft or missile, that is capable of doing what these craft can do. The very high speeds, the angular manoeuvre and the unlimited climbing rate exhilaration etc, this in itself does assure that the craft in question has the ability to get out of the way of anything we can put into the sky at the present moment, they do have the capability of eluding anything we have in this line of flight. So these craft have the detection capabilities to avoid all such radar technology we have. Therefore this has brought about a situation of no type of evidence has been submitted to or has been discovered by any air force in the world. However these discovered craft do reflect light and are classified as unidentified flying objects do alter all is said and done inevitably do give one a presentation of a craft that dose represent a technology much beyond the present days scientific knowledge.

A sighting is considered unidentified when a report does apparently contain all the pertinent facts necessary to suggest a valid hypothesis concerning the cause or explanation of the report but the description of the object or its motion cannot be correlated with any known object or phenomena meteorological astronomical or natural.