|
Well, did these photos
depict winged entities or the faces of aliens? In a sense yes, since
that is what the eye may be encouraged to see, but as usual with the
vast majority of this type of image, the real cause of the anomaly is
very mundane.
Fig 1 and Fig 2 did
not depict winged entities or spirits; both were from one photo taken on
Saturday November 20th, in my back garden.
|


Fig 4 |
The anomalies are
nothing more than falling snow; the shapes differ when compared to rain
and other 'particulate orbs' due to the relatively flat hexagonal
structure of a snowflake, so depending on their angle to the camera,
different shapes will be captured. The 'sprites' in Fig 1 exhibit an
apparent trial/tail due to the asynchronous shutter and flash speeds
(See the September 2004 issue of SPI's Enigmas for a full
explanation). Fig 4 shows the full frame, and as you can see it
contains all manner of 'mundane anomalies', including the more common
‘particulate orb’.
Fig 3
did not depict the faces of greys encompassed with a mysterious mist.
|

Fig 5 |
This is but one of a
number of photos I took on the bank holiday Monday of the festive week,
when we were blessed with fine days of wintry sunshine. The photo was
taken looking south, so the low midday sun is right in the frame,
causing the lens flare artefact common to that particular Fuji S602
digital camera. Fig 5 shows the full frame.
In this image, the flare
artefact is over a pattern within the crop of winter wheat in the field
behind (although the Michael Line does run through this field, and is
roughly running mid-ground right to left!), so the patterns show through
the flare.
In this instance the
patterns coincidentally form shapes and patterns that the human eye and
mind try to interpret into familiar shapes.
These images again
demonstrate that evidence of ‘spirit’ or other ‘anomalies' need careful
and logical analysis before claims of authenticity can be made.
|